STANDARD VERSUS ALTERNATING NON-CROSS-RESISTANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN EXTENSIVE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - AN EORTC PHASE-III TRIAL

Alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer has been tested in several studies. Some have shown positive results that have not been confirmed in other studies. In all of the studies, however, the degree of non-cross-resistance in the regimens was questionable. The EORTC L ung Cancer Study Group developed two equipotent regimens: (i) standard (CDE)-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide; (ii) (VIMP)-vincristi ne, carboplatin, ifosfamide, mesna, both non-cross-resistance. These t wo combinations were alternated and compared with the standard chemoth erapy regimen in a group of 143 patients with extensive small cell lun g cancer. Median survival was 7.6 months in the standard arm and 8.7 i n the alternating arm (P = 0.243). Median time to progression was 5.8 and 6.4 months, respectively (P = 0.166). Median response duration was 7.0 and 6.8 months (P = 0.221). The use of two alternating regimens w ith a proven degree of non-cross-resistance did not result in any impr ovement in survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd