K. Boyd et al., THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGE AND THE USE OF DNR ORDERS IN CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS - EVIDENCE FOR AGE-DISCRIMINATION, Archives of internal medicine, 156(16), 1996, pp. 1821-1826
Objective: To determine whether a relationship exists between the use
of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in the intensive care unit and the
age of the patient after controlling for the severity of illness. Meth
ods: Patients from the Mortality Probability Model database, which inc
ludes 6103 patients in 4 large hospitals, and from a second database,
which includes 3226 additional patients in 25 hospitals, were analyzed
through logistic regression seeking a relationship between age and DN
R use. Adult medical and surgical intensive care units from 27 hospita
ls in the United States were included. Results: In the Mortality Proba
bility Model database, 11.4% of the patients had DNR orders written. I
n the group of patients younger than 65 years, 8% had DNR orders. This
percentage climbed rapidly with age. For age ranges of 65 to younger
than 75 years, 75 to younger than 85 years, and 85 years or older, the
percentage of patients who had a DNR order was 11.2%, 18.9%, and 32.6
%, respectively. Similar results were found in the second database: 5.
4% of patients had DNR orders and, again, the rise in the use of DNR o
rders was associated with increased age. For patients younger than 75
years, 4.2% had DNR orders. For the older groups, 75 to younger than 8
5 years and 85 years and older, the rates were 8.8% and 15.4%, respect
ively. Logistic regression was used to control for severity of illness
; when compared with patients younger than 65 years, patients 75 to yo
unger than 85 years were 50% more likely to have DNR orders written an
d patients 85 years or older were 140% more likely to have DNR orders
written. Conclusions: Older patients (greater than or equal to 75 year
s old) are significantly more likely than younger patients to have DNR
orders written even after the severity of illness is controlled as a
confounding variable. This association suggests age discrimination and
becomes stronger as patient age increases.