Prescribed burning expenditures are based on the fire manager's judgme
nt about the ''risk'' of the fire escaping and his/her anticipation of
the consequences of such an escape. In a high-risk site, more resourc
es are needed to prepare the site for a safe burn. If a fire escapes,
or if the fire is postponed, additional costs are incurred. Site attri
butes, probable consequences, and the individual's experience and inna
te risk posture interact to blur the distinction between estimating an
d anticipating the escape. Rational allocation of resources requires a
clear distinction between the likelihoods of escape and the consequen
ces. To evaluate factors affecting the risk of escape separately from
consideration of the consequences, and to begin a more diagnostic appr
oach to fire risk assessment, we used an expert system approach. Facto
rs related to escape potential were evaluated, prioritized, weighted,
and encoded into the rules of a prototype expert system which then pro
vided recommendations for carrying out a burn safely and effectively.
Three test cases supported the logic used in the expert system, and po
inted to ways that the expert system could be improved. Experience wit
h the system supported previous research on the need to consider the h
uman element in estimating fire escape potential.