Pg. Angold et al., LOCATIONAL ERRORS IN MAPS FROM ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR INFORMATION EXTRACTION, Journal of environmental management, 47(4), 1996, pp. 341-354
1. Information on all maps, including those which depict characters of
the natural environment, is subject to locational error. 2. Locationa
l errors on field-sketched maps are attributable to inaccuracies both
in the base map itself and in the method of locating and recording fea
tures onto the base map. 3. Two main sources of error associated with
field sketch mapping were quantified using the River Corridor Survey m
aps as an example. First, channel widths are routinely exaggerated on
these maps to allow recording of in-channel features. Distortions of r
iver bank length of the order of 25% were shown to arise from a four-f
old exaggeration of the width of a sinuous channel. Second, discrepanc
ies in feature location of the order of 20% were found along a 500 m r
iver stretch, although errors could be reduced to approximately 2% if
undistorted, large-scale base maps were used. 4. An abundance scale ap
propriate to the inherent locational inaccuracy was devised to extract
semi-quantitative information from River Corridor Surveys recorded on
distorted base maps. Application of this scale to 29 River Corridor S
urvey maps of a 14.5 km river corridor produced a useful representatio
n of environmental gradients within the corridor. 5. With the increasi
ng potential to integrate and analyse environmental information within
large computer databases including Geographic Information Systems, it
is essential that the level of accuracy is recognised and quantified
so that the errors can be allowed for in the development of methods of
extracting information from the maps. (C) 1996 Academic Press Limited