Plcm. Vanriel et al., DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RESPONSE CRITERIA IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - STEPS TOWARDS AN INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS ON PROGNOSTIC MARKERS, British journal of rheumatology, 35, 1996, pp. 4-7
The course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is highly variable, ranging fr
om a mild self-limiting to a very aggressive form. To follow and predi
ct the course of the disease in an individual patient, several recogni
zed and proposed prognostic markers, including markers for disease act
ivity, have been considered. However, no individual marker for disease
activity has shown satisfactory specificity and sensitivity. Thus an
index of disease activity combining several variables is needed. Respo
nse criteria based on the Disease Activity Score (DAS) were developed
in an open study of 227 patients with RA of recent onset. Response was
defined as a combination of a significant change from baseline and th
e level of disease activity attained. Good response was defined as a s
ignificant decrease in DAS (>1.2) and a low level of disease activity
(less than or equal to 2.4), Non-response was defined as a decrease le
ss than or equal to 0.6, or a decrease >0.6 and less than or equal to
1.2 with an attained DAS >3.7. Any other scores were regarded as moder
ate responses. These response criteria were adopted as the EULAR respo
nse criteria and were validated, together with the WHO/ILAR and ACR re
sponse criteria, in a 48 week, double-blind trial comparing hydroxychl
oroquine and sulphasalazine in 60 patients. Response was evaluated aga
inst radiographic damage (construct validity) and functional disabilit
y (criterion validity); discriminating capacity was also assessed. EUL
AR response criteria showed significant association with X-ray progres
sion and functional disability, and differentiated between sulphasalaz
ine and hydroxychloroquine. ACR and WHO/ILAR response criteria perform
ed less well, only showing good criterion validity. Several groups are
working on the prognosis of early RA and have agreed to collaborate t
o test DAS and other prognostic markers to better recognize severe, pr
ogressive RA, before joint damage takes place.