MOTION SUPPRESSION IN MR-IMAGING OF THE LIVER - COMPARISON OF RESPIRATORY-TRIGGERED AND NONTRIGGERED FAST SPIN-ECHO SEQUENCES

Citation
Rn. Low et al., MOTION SUPPRESSION IN MR-IMAGING OF THE LIVER - COMPARISON OF RESPIRATORY-TRIGGERED AND NONTRIGGERED FAST SPIN-ECHO SEQUENCES, American journal of roentgenology, 168(1), 1997, pp. 225-231
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
0361803X
Volume
168
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
225 - 231
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(1997)168:1<225:MSIMOT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of a respirato ry-triggered fast spin-echo (RTFSE) pulse sequence and a nontriggered fast spin-echo pulse sequence for imaging liver masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-one patients with suspected liver masses were imaged at 1.5 T with a fast spin-echo sequence and an RTFSE sequence designed t o trigger data acquisition at end expiration. All other imaging parame ters were identical. MR images were compared qualitatively for lesion detection and conspicuity, anatomic sharpness, vascular definition, ph ase artifacts, and overall image quality. Quantitative analysis was pe rformed to obtain lesion-liver contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (C NR) measurements of all liver masses. RESULTS. Thirty-three patients h ad liver masses. The RTFSE images showed superior anatomic sharpness i n 83% of examinations and superior overall image quality in 85% of exa minations. Lesion detection and conspicuity were superior for the RTFS E images in 53% of examinations and were similar for the two technique s in 38%. In 10 patients we detected more lesions on RTFSE images, and in one patient we detected more lesions on fast spin-echo images. In the remaining patients the number of lesions detected on RTFSE images was identical to the number detected on fast spin-echo images. Respira tory artifacts were less noticeable on the RTFSE images in 66% of exam inations and on the fast spin-echo images in 14%. Quantitative analysi s showed a 29% increase in mean relative lesion-liver contrast and a 3 4% increase in mean relative CNR for the RTFSE images. Mean lesion-liv er contrast and CNR for the RTFSE images (152.6 +/- 100.9, 14.2 +/- 9. 3) were superior to corresponding values for the fast spin-echo images (123.4 +/- 88.0, 10.9 +/- 7.4) (p < .0001). CONCLUSION. Compared with nontriggered fast spin-echo MR images, the RTFSE MR images were super ior for our evaluation of liver masses. By acquiring data during a per iod of reduced respiratory motion, the RTFSE sequence produced images with sharper anatomic detail, equal or less phase ghosting, and measur able improvement in the lesion-liver contrast and CNR.