Rn. Low et al., MOTION SUPPRESSION IN MR-IMAGING OF THE LIVER - COMPARISON OF RESPIRATORY-TRIGGERED AND NONTRIGGERED FAST SPIN-ECHO SEQUENCES, American journal of roentgenology, 168(1), 1997, pp. 225-231
OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of a respirato
ry-triggered fast spin-echo (RTFSE) pulse sequence and a nontriggered
fast spin-echo pulse sequence for imaging liver masses. MATERIALS AND
METHODS. Forty-one patients with suspected liver masses were imaged at
1.5 T with a fast spin-echo sequence and an RTFSE sequence designed t
o trigger data acquisition at end expiration. All other imaging parame
ters were identical. MR images were compared qualitatively for lesion
detection and conspicuity, anatomic sharpness, vascular definition, ph
ase artifacts, and overall image quality. Quantitative analysis was pe
rformed to obtain lesion-liver contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (C
NR) measurements of all liver masses. RESULTS. Thirty-three patients h
ad liver masses. The RTFSE images showed superior anatomic sharpness i
n 83% of examinations and superior overall image quality in 85% of exa
minations. Lesion detection and conspicuity were superior for the RTFS
E images in 53% of examinations and were similar for the two technique
s in 38%. In 10 patients we detected more lesions on RTFSE images, and
in one patient we detected more lesions on fast spin-echo images. In
the remaining patients the number of lesions detected on RTFSE images
was identical to the number detected on fast spin-echo images. Respira
tory artifacts were less noticeable on the RTFSE images in 66% of exam
inations and on the fast spin-echo images in 14%. Quantitative analysi
s showed a 29% increase in mean relative lesion-liver contrast and a 3
4% increase in mean relative CNR for the RTFSE images. Mean lesion-liv
er contrast and CNR for the RTFSE images (152.6 +/- 100.9, 14.2 +/- 9.
3) were superior to corresponding values for the fast spin-echo images
(123.4 +/- 88.0, 10.9 +/- 7.4) (p < .0001). CONCLUSION. Compared with
nontriggered fast spin-echo MR images, the RTFSE MR images were super
ior for our evaluation of liver masses. By acquiring data during a per
iod of reduced respiratory motion, the RTFSE sequence produced images
with sharper anatomic detail, equal or less phase ghosting, and measur
able improvement in the lesion-liver contrast and CNR.