This paper estimates the incremental cost-effectiveness of providing a
ntenatal anti-D prophylaxis in varying dose sizes to either primigravi
dae or all Rh D negative women. It presents a model for calculating th
e net cost per 1000 'at risk' women based on the costs of anti-D proph
ylaxis and the future NHS costs avoided. Incremental cost-effectivenes
s is measured in terms of the net cost per Rh D-alloimmunization and t
he net cost per Rh HD loss prevented. Programmes for Rh D negative pri
migravidae are more cost-effective than the same dose protocol extende
d to all Rh D negative women. The 1 x 1250 in programme is the most co
st-effective option.