Ss. Gambhir et al., DECISION TREE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FDG-PET IN THE STAGING AND MANAGEMENT OF NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CARCINOMA, The Journal of nuclear medicine, 37(9), 1996, pp. 1428-1436
Preliminary studies have shown that PET is more accurate than CT for t
he staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, the pote
ntial effect of PET on the management of these patients and its cost-e
ffectiveness has not been rigorously studied. Thus, we have used decis
ion tree sensitivity analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of a PE
T based strategy for staging of NSCLC. Methods: Two decision strategie
s for selection of potential surgical candidates were compared; thorac
ic CT alone or thoracic CT and thoracic PET. The first decision tree w
as conservatively constructed by requiring mediastinoscopy (biopsy) to
confirm imaging results so that no patient with surgically curable di
sease would miss the opportunity for surgery in either strategy. A sec
ond less conservative tree in which only nonconcordant results are bio
psied was also tested. The various paths of each strategy are dependen
t on numerous parameters which were determined from a review of the me
dical literature. Life expectancy was calculated using the declining e
xponential approximation of life expectancy and reduced based on proce
dural mortality. Costs were based on mean costs at our institution. Fo
r all possible outcomes of each strategy, the expected cost and projec
ted life expectancy were determined. The effect of changing one or mor
e parameters on the expected cost and life expectancy were studied usi
ng a sensitivity analysis. Results: The CT + PET strategy in the conse
rvative decision tree showed a saving of $1154 per patient without a l
oss of life expectancy (increase of 2.96 days) as compared to the alte
rnate strategy of CT alone. Both these effects were the result of impr
oved staging of lung carcinoma prior to the decision for surgery. The
CT + PET strategy in the less conservative decision tree showed a savi
ngs of $2267 per patient but misses 1.7% of potentially operable patie
nts. Conclusion: These results show through rigorous decision tree ana
lysis, the potential cost-effectiveness of using FDG PET in the manage
ment of NSCLC. These results form a basis for detailed study of the re
sults obtained from multicenter trials on the accuracy of PET in NSCLC
management. Furthermore, the techniques utilized for decision tree an
alysis have broad range of applicability to the entire field of nuclea
r medicine.