PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPY, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE STAGING OF GASTRIC-CANCER

Citation
Da. Stell et al., PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPY, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE STAGING OF GASTRIC-CANCER, British Journal of Surgery, 83(9), 1996, pp. 1260-1262
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00071323
Volume
83
Issue
9
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1260 - 1262
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1323(1996)83:9<1260:PCOLUA>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
A total of 103 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was as sessed for intra-abdominal spread of malignancy using ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) and laparoscopy under general anaesthesia. H istologically proven metastases were to the liver in 27 patients, lymp h nodes in 49 and directly to peritoneum in 13. All modalities showed a high specificity (92-100 per cent) for each type of metastasis. Lapa roscopy was more sensitive in detecting hepatic, nodal and peritoneal metastases; the relative performance of laparoscopy was best with rega rd to hepatic metastases. Ultrasonography and CT were particularly poo r at detecting nodal and peritoneal metastases. There was no significa nt morbidity and no mortality associated with laparoscopy, which was m ore accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer than ultrasonog raphy or CT.