This article deals with a problem that is perceived as extremely burde
nsome by all those having to deal with it: the necessity of selecting
the recipients of lifesaving medical resources that are not sufficient
ly available to meet the demand, so that some of the potential benefic
iaries must be left to die. Against the background of discussions abou
t increasing pressures on the health care system to ration ressources,
it is argued that this problem, known as that of ''triage'' in milita
ry and disaster medicine and believed to arise only in rare instances
of sudden catastrophes, is now becoming an everyday phenomenon in vari
ous areas within the medical sector; However, very little is known abo
ut how it is ''resolved'' in practice. This paper discusses three exam
ples of everyday triage and reconstructs the logic and premises underl
ying the decision behavior of those responsible in the respective area
s.