The literature contains numerous claims that 90% of all the informatio
n used in driving is visual. This article presents a theoretical discu
ssion, a citation search, and a review of evidence concerning such cla
ims. The findings indicate that not only do we lack data from which to
derive an accurate numerical estimate, but we lack a measurement syst
em within which any numerical estimate would be meaningful. Consequent
ly, although the information relevant to driving is likely to be predo
minantly visual, any claims about the precise percentage attributable
to vision are premature. The proliferation of such claims in the absen
ce of direct evidence is a reminder that researchers should be careful
about assuring the validity of the claims they are passing on.