EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS OF LOW CONCENTRATIONS OF DDT, DDE AND DDD IN SMALL VOLUMES OF SEDIMENT PORE-WATER

Citation
Am. Cotter et al., EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS OF LOW CONCENTRATIONS OF DDT, DDE AND DDD IN SMALL VOLUMES OF SEDIMENT PORE-WATER, Chemosphere, 33(7), 1996, pp. 1341-1354
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00456535
Volume
33
Issue
7
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1341 - 1354
Database
ISI
SICI code
0045-6535(1996)33:7<1341:EAAOLC>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
As a result of effluent discharges by a previous chemical manufacturer , sediments in the Huntsville Spring Branch-Indian Creek (HSB-IC) near Huntsville, AL are contaminated with DDT and its metabolites. This ar ea was selected as a field location at which to evaluate equilibrium p artitioning theory (EqP) to predict the bioavailability of nonionic or ganic chemicals associated with sediments. An important component of t he evaluation of EqP features determination of contaminant concentrati ons in the sediment interstitial (pore) water. The objective of our st udy was to develop an analytical method to measure o,p'- and p,p'-DDE, DDD and DDT at low concentrations (< 1 ng/mL) in small volumes (ca., 30 mL) of sediment pore water. initially, pore water from a clean, unc ontaminated (control) sediment was spiked with DDT and its metabolites and extracted with hexane. The extracts were applied to chromatograph y columns packed with acid silica gel or acid celite to remove interfe ring compounds. Gas chromatograms of extracts treated with acid celite exhibited lower background interferences and were easier to interpret than chromatograms for samples processed using acid silica gel. The a cid celite technique was further assessed by spiking uncontaminated po re water over a range of DDE, DDD and DDT concentrations and evaluatin g recovery efficiencies for each target analyte. Polychlorinated biphe nyl congener, 2,3,5,6-tetrachlorobiphenyl (PCB 065) was determined to be a good compound for monitoring method performance (e.g., analyte re covery). Pore water samples were obtained from nine sampling sites in the HSB-IC system and analyzed for DDT and its metabolites where conce ntrations ranged from 0.020 ng/mL (detection limit) to 8.200 ng/mL in 30 mL of pore water. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd