Since the beginning of the eighties, regional technology and developme
nt policies in industrialized countries have pursued, among other thin
gs, the goal of attracting and supporting high-tech industries. Very o
ften high-tech regions, such as legendary Silicon Valley, Calif., or R
oute 128, Mass., served as models. But there are high-tech regions in
other industrialized countries, too. This paper analyses the reasons f
or the genesis of seven high-tech regions in Germany (Munich), France
(Grenoble); Great Britain ('Western Crescent' west oi London, Cambridg
eshire), Japan (Kyushu) and the U.S.A. ('Silicon Valley', 'Research Tr
iangle'). These reasons will be set against some of the most popular t
heories claiming to explain technology-based regional growth. None of
the theoretical approaches are suitable to help explain unambiguously
the causes of the development of individuals, let alone all of the hig
h-tech regions discussed here. Each one has specific strengths and wea
knesses. An 'eclectic' theory, which combines convincing aspects of th
e above-mentioned theories, may offer the best approach to the problem
. One element of such an eclectic approach should be governments' (imp
licit or explicit) influence on high-tech regions, which was not suffi
ciently considered by the theories discussed above. The applicability
of a revised version of Porter's (1990) system of determinants of nati
onal competitiveness to high-tech regions is stressed. Copyright (C) 1
996 Elsevier Science Ltd