LENGTH OF INPATIENT STAY AND RECIDIVISM AMONG PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA

Citation
L. Appleby et al., LENGTH OF INPATIENT STAY AND RECIDIVISM AMONG PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA, Psychiatric services, 47(9), 1996, pp. 985-990
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath",Psychiatry,"Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
10752730
Volume
47
Issue
9
Year of publication
1996
Pages
985 - 990
Database
ISI
SICI code
1075-2730(1996)47:9<985:LOISAR>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objective: The study examined whether length of hospital stay is relat ed to recidivism among psychiatric patients. A quasi-experimental appr oach was used to address limitations of controlled and epidemiological research. Methods: Three matched groups, each consisting of 55 inpati ents with schizophrenia, were selected fi om public psychiatric units with different mean lengths of stay Regression models were used to com pare the groups on three variables: time to first readmission (surviva l analysis), number of readmissions (ordinal legit regression), and to tal time in the community in the postdischarge year (multiple linear r egression). Results: An analysis based on the units with different len gths of stay, which was similar to that typically used in controlled s tudies, found no differences in the three outcome measures. However, a second analysis that examined data for all patients irrespective of t heir unit assignment found that inpatients treated for 30 days or less relapsed sooner than those with stays longer than 30 days. The dispar ity in results was largely due to overlapping quasi-experimental condi tions: many patients on the short-stay units had a long lengths of sta y; and vice versa, The first analysis supports an administrative polic y of short stays. The second reinforces previous findings that a group of patients, primarily young males with onset of illness at an early age and multiple previous hospitalizations, is at greater risk of rela pse with short-term treatment, Conclusions: The apparent contradiction between a unit- or patient-based analysis suggests that unit-based re sults: should be interpreted with caution when used to make clinical o r utilization review decisions