Little information has been published concerning the timeliness of fol
low-up after abnormal mammography. This article presents data on follo
w-up after abnormal mammography, including differences in follow-up by
age, race, mammographic interpretation, and type of tracking system.
From unpublished data, the rate of timely follow-up 8 to 12 weeks afte
r index abnormal mammography ranges from 69% to 99%. Women aged 65 and
older, those of lower socioeconomic status, and those who are instruc
ted to have repeat evaluations in four to six months have the highest
proportion of untimely follow-up. With use of computer-based tracking
systems, timely follow-up ranges from 89% to 99%. Computer-based track
ing systems should be encouraged to promote timely follow-up of abnorm
al mammography. Further research is needed to better delineate those a
t risk for untimely follow-up after abnormal mammography, causes of un
timely follow-up, the impact of untimely follow-up on breast cancer st
age and mortality, and interventions that maximize timely follow-up.