Objectives: To determine the overall perforation of gloves due to need
le-stick injuries, during orthopedic and trauma operations, to assess
the protection provided and to suggest precautions to be instituted. D
esign: Prospective collection and examination of 258 pairs of surgical
gloves during 116 orthopedic and trauma operations. Setting: King Fah
d Hospital, King Faisal University, Dammam. Results: One-hundred and f
orty seven gloves (28.4%) were found to be perforated out of which 81%
were perforated during trauma and the rest during orthopedic operatio
ns. Right glove was punctured in 114 gloves (77. 5%) and the thumb and
index finger were the commonest sites. Seventy-two percent of the per
forations went unrecognized. One-hundred and eleven gloves were perfor
ated during operations of over one hour and thirty minutes (p value <
0.005) Conclusions: Glove perforations during trauma and orthopedic su
rgery is common and in the majority of cases goes unrecognized. Surgeo
ns appear unaware of cross infection from patient to surgeon and vice-
versa nor do they consider precautions mandatory.