EXPRESSION OF 2 HETEROLOGOUS PROMOTERS, AGROBACTERIUM-RHIZOGENES ROLCAND CAULIFLOWER MOSAIC-VIRUS 35S, IN THE STEM OF TRANSGENIC HYBRID ASPEN PLANTS DURING THE ANNUAL CYCLE OF GROWTH AND DORMANCY
O. Nilsson et al., EXPRESSION OF 2 HETEROLOGOUS PROMOTERS, AGROBACTERIUM-RHIZOGENES ROLCAND CAULIFLOWER MOSAIC-VIRUS 35S, IN THE STEM OF TRANSGENIC HYBRID ASPEN PLANTS DURING THE ANNUAL CYCLE OF GROWTH AND DORMANCY, Plant molecular biology, 31(4), 1996, pp. 887-895
We monitored, for the first time, the activity of two model heterologo
us promoters, the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolC and the cauliflower mo
saic virus (CaMV) 35S, throughout the annual cycle of growth and dorma
ncy in a perennial species, hybrid aspen. Each promoter was fused to t
he uidA beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene and the constructs were
introduced into the hybrid aspen genome by Agrobacterium-mediated tra
nsformation. Both wild type and transgenic plants were cultivated unde
r different regimes of photoperiod and temperature to induce passage t
hrough one growth-dormancy-reactivation cycle, and at intervals GUS st
aining was assessed in stem sections. In rolC::uidA transformants, GUS
activity in rapidly growing current-year shoots was not only tissue s
pecific, being localized to the phloem, but also cell-specific at the
shoot base, where it was present only in the companion cells. However,
during the onset of dormancy induced by short photoperiod, GUS activi
ty shifted laterally from the phloem to include the cortex and pith. A
fter subsequent exposure to chilling temperatures to induce the transi
tion between the dormancy stages of rest and quiescence, GUS activity
almost disappeared from all stem tissues, but regained its original ph
loem specificity and intensity after the shoots were reactivated by ex
posing them to long photoperiod and high temperatures. In contrast, GU
S activity in the stem of 35S::uidA transformants was strong in all ti
ssues except for the vascular cambium and xylem, and did not vary in i
ntensity during the growth-dormancy-reactivation cycle. The lateral sh
ift and increased intensity of GUS activity in the stem of rolC::uidA
transformants during dormancy induction was shown to be associated wit
h the accumulation of starch, and to be mimicked by incubating stem se
ctions in sucrose, as well as glucose and fructose, but not sorbitol,
prior to the GUS assay. Our results demonstrate that the activities of
the rolC and 35S promoters varied in very different, unpredictable wa
ys during the annual cycle of growth and dormancy in a perennial speci
es, and indicate that the spatial and temporal variation in rolC promo
ter activity that we observed in the stem of transgenic hybrid aspen p
lants is attributable to cellular and seasonal changes in sucrose cont
ent.