TESTING A GCM LAND-SURFACE SCHEME AGAINST CATCHMENT-SCALE RUNOFF DATA

Citation
Aj. Pitman et Fhs. Chiew, TESTING A GCM LAND-SURFACE SCHEME AGAINST CATCHMENT-SCALE RUNOFF DATA, Climate dynamics, 12(10), 1996, pp. 685-699
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
09307575
Volume
12
Issue
10
Year of publication
1996
Pages
685 - 699
Database
ISI
SICI code
0930-7575(1996)12:10<685:TAGLSA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
A GCM land surface scheme was used, in off-line mode, to simulate the runoff, latent and sensible heat fluxes for two distinct Australian ca tchments using observed atmospheric forcing. The tropical Jardine Rive r catchment is 2500 km(2) and has an annual rainfall of 1700 mm y(-1) while the Canning River catchment is 540 km(2), has a Mediterranean cl imate (annual rainfall of 800 mm y(-1)) and is ephemeral for half the year. It was found that the standard version of a land surface scheme developed for a GCM, and initialised as for incorporation into a GCM, simulated similar latent and sensible heat fluxes compared to a basin- scale hydrological model (MODHYDROLOG) which was calibrated for each c atchment. However, the standard version of the land surface scheme gro ssly overestimated the observed peak runoff in the wet Jardine River c atchment at the expense of runoff later in the season. Increasing the soil water storage permitted the land surface scheme to simulate obser ved runoff quite well, but led to a different simulation of latent and sensible heat compared to MODHYDROLOG. It is concluded that this 2-la yer land surface scheme was unable to simulate both catchments realist ically. The land surface scheme was then extended to a three-layer mod el. In terms of runoff, the resulting control simulations with soil de pths chosen as for the GCM were better than the best simulations obtai ned with the two-layer model, The three-layer model simulated similar latent and sensible heat for both catchments compared to MODHYDROLOG. Unfortunately, for the ephemeral Canning River catchment, the land sur face scheme was unable to time the observed runoff peak correctly. A t entative conclusion would be that this GCM land surface scheme may be able to simulate the present day state of some larger and wetter catch ments but not catchments with peaky hydrographs and zero flows for par t of the year. This conclusion requires examination with a range of GC M land surface schemes against a range of catchments.