We point out that, contrary to what is believed to hold for QCD, renor
malons are genuine in QED; i.e. the ambiguities which come with them d
o not require cancellation by hypothetical non-perturbative contributi
ons. They are just the ambiguities characteristic of any trivial - and
thus effective - theory. If QED remained an isolated theory up to an
energy close to its triviality scale, these ambiguities would surely h
int at new physics. This not being so, the renormalon ambiguities in Q
ED lead to no new physics, not even to non-perturbative contributions
within QED itself.