This paper reports on a conceptualization of previously reported data
by the authors. Using the critical incident technique, tourists were a
sked to recount their most positive and most negative tourism experien
ces. These qualitative data were reduced using the attribution theory.
This framework allows researchers to determine which of four causes (
ability, effort, task ease/difficulty, and luck) they use to explain t
heir experiences. Results showed an attribution bias where tourists ar
e more likely to use internal (dispositional) attributions for positiv
e tourism outcomes compared to more external (situation) attributions
for negative experiences. Tourists perceive less personal control for
both positive and negative experiences. Implications for the industry,
tourism education, and tourists themselves are discussed. Copyright (
C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd