The links between certain kinds of political systems and protection ag
ainst famine ave investigated in this payer. The starting-point is a c
ritique of Amartya Sen's observation that famines are unknown in count
ries with a free press and competitive elections. This holds true only
in India because of a unique political history in which freedom from
famine became a right, upon which political legitimacy was founded: an
anti-famine 'social contract'. The rise and decline of anti-famine sy
stems in Africa is charted. Major reasons for decay include neo-libera
lism and the international humanitarian system, both of which undermin
e relationships of domestic political accountability that underpin eff
ective famine prevention. A number of politically regressive tendencie
s in 'actually existing humanitarianism' are identified that work agai
nst any nascent anti-famine social contracts in Africa. This is possib
le because famine prevention has not been established as a right in Af
rica.