Eo. Pettersen et H. Wang, RADIATION-MODIFYING EFFECT OF OXYGEN IN SYNCHRONIZED CELLS PRETREATEDWITH ACUTE OR PROLONGED HYPOXIA, International journal of radiation biology, 70(3), 1996, pp. 319-326
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging","Nuclear Sciences & Tecnology
The objective of the present study Tvas to measure the sensitizing eff
ect of oxygen following acute as well as protracted hypoxia in cell cu
ltures of maximum homogeneity. Human cells of the established line NHI
K 3025 were synchronized by the method of mitotic selection and irradi
ated while in late G1 (aerobic conditions) or in the oxygen-sensitive
restriction point near the G1/S border. Four different condi tions of
oxygen treatment were used: (1) Cells were irradiated under aerobic co
nditions 5h after mitotic selection (G1 lasts for 6.5h in these cells)
. (2) Cells were irradiated under extremely hypoxic conditions (i.e. <
4 ppm O-2) following an acute (30 min) deoxygenation starting 5 h afte
r mitotic selection. (3) Cells were irradiated under aerobic condition
s immediately following 20h of extreme hypoxia which was started 5h fo
llowing mitotic selection. (4) Cells were irradiated under extremely h
ypoxic conditions after 20h of extreme hypoxia starting 5h after mitot
ic selection. In addition, asynchronous cells were irradiated, either
without any pretreatment, or after reoxygenation, following 20 h of ex
treme hypoxia. The data indicate that the sensitizing effect of oxygen
(after protracted hypoxia) is strictly dose-modifying for cells rende
red hypoxic while in late G1 and arrested in the oxygen-sensitive rest
riction point in late G1. There is a non-dose-modifying sensitization
when synchronized control cells, irradiated under aerobic conditions,
are compared with synchronized cells irradiated during acute hypoxia.
In this case, however, one is comparing cells in two different biologi
cal states, i.e. cells in an ordinary G1 are compared with cells arres
ted in the oxygen-sensitive restriction point in G1. The non-dose-modi
fying nature of the oxygen sensitization as observed in this case may,
therefore, reflect biological differences between the cell cultures t
hat are compared rather than differences with respect to the radiochem
ical sensitization as induced by oxygen at small and large radiation d
oses. The present data indicate, however, that if cancer cells in huma
n rumours are best represented by a mixture of aerobic cells and chron
ic hypoxic cells, oxygen may appear to exert no effect, or perhaps eve
n a net protective effect, at low radiation doses.