The centrality of consensus in contemporary inquiries into society lim
its our understanding of dissent and contemporary disputation. This pa
per raises the question of what rob dissent plays in contemporary soci
ety by interrogating an exemplar of traditional social rhetoric, the p
ublic sphere. An examination of the six characteristics of the public
sphere suggests that the dominance of consensus has restricted our und
erstanding of contemporary public argument and resistance. The possibi
lity of de-centering consensus and the public sphere and reconsidering
dissension is explored.