E. Farish et al., EFFECTS OF POSTMENOPAUSAL HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY ON LIPOPROTEINSINCLUDING LIPOPROTEIN(A) AND LDL SUBFRACTIONS, Atherosclerosis, 126(1), 1996, pp. 77-84
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on lipoprotein ri
sk markers for CHD of oestradiol given alone and in combination with t
he androgenic progestogen, norethisterone. Eighty postmenopausal women
were randomly allocated to receive oestradiol (2 mg/day) alone or wit
h continuous norethisterone (1 mg/day). Serum lipoprotein levels, incl
uding lipoprotein(a), were monitored during 12 months on treatment in
all the women, and in a sub-set of 32 patients cholesterol was measure
d in the two major density subfractions of LDL. Oestradiol caused a tr
ansient rise in triglycerides, a small decrease in LDL cholesterol (si
gnificant only at 3 and 6 months, P < 0.05) and a consistent significa
nt increase in HDL cholesterol (16%, P < 0.01). There was a downward t
rend in lipoprotein(a) levels which did not achieve statistical signif
icance. The combined preparation caused significant, sustained decreas
es in triglycerides (31%, P < 0.01), total cholesterol (15%, P < 0.001
), VLDL (42%, P < 0.01), LDL (9%, P < 0.05) and HDL (11%, P < 0.001).
Lipoprotein(a) was also reduced (39%, P < 0.05). In the sub-set of pat
ients in which LDL subfractions were measured, the reduction in LDL in
duced by oestradiol monotherapy was significant only at the 3-month vi
sit (6%, P < 0.05). This was due to a decrease in the 'light' (1.025 <
d < 1.044 g/ml) subfraction (10%, P < 0.05) and resulted in an appare
nt shift in subfraction distribution towards the 'heavy' (1.044 < d <
1.060 g/ml) subfraction, although there was no absolute increase in th
e latter. None of these changes was statistically significant at 12 mo
nths. Oestradiol/norethisterone caused sustained decreases in both 'li
ght' (15%, P < 0.05) and 'heavy' (29%, P < 0.05) subfractions, with no
significant change in the relative amounts. The changes in 'light' an
d 'heavy' LDL in this group were highly correlated with changes in tri
glyceride levels (r = -0.57, P < 0.05 and r = 0.82, P < 0.01 respectiv
ely). Therefore, at the end of 1 year's treatment with unopposed oestr
adiol the only statistically significant change was an increase in HDL
cholesterol. Addition of norethisterone to the preparation reversed t
his potentially beneficial change, but favourably influenced triglycer
ides, VLDL, LDL subfraction profile and lipoprotein(a), which may coun
teract the adverse effect on HDL.