O. Bechhanssen et al., PREOPERATIVE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC PREDICTION OF SMALL PROSTHESIS SIZE FOR AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT, Journal of heart valve disease, 5(2), 1996, pp. 128-135
Background and aims of the study: Prosthesis size is known to have an
effect on long term outcome after heart valve replacement. We evaluate
d 115 patients subjected to aortic valve replacement to assess the abi
lity by preoperative echocardiography to identify patients having smal
l aortic roots and thereby likely to receive a small prosthesis (size
19 or 21), previously shown to be associated with a worse prognosis. M
ethods: From an initial part of the study (Group A), comprising 67 pat
ients, we evaluated the influence of image quality on the accuracy for
prediction of patients receiving a small prosthesis. In a second seri
es of 48 patients (Group B), we tested the predictive value of various
limits of aortic annulus diameter to define patients at risk of a sma
ll receiving cr prosthesis. Results: The measurement of aortic annulus
diameter in Group A,gave a reasonable correlation to subsequent prost
hetic dimension (r = 0.73, n = 59). However, there was a considerable
variation of echocardiographic aortic annulus diameter among patients
receiving prostheses of the same size. In Group B, an aortic annulus d
iameter of 122 mm correctly identified 10 of 13 patients receiving a s
mall prosthesis (sensitivity 77%). Twenty-two of 25 patients (88%) wit
h an aortic annulus diameter > 22 mm received a large prosthesis. Conc
lusions: We conclude that the echocardiographic measurement of the aor
tic annulus diameter is a fairly sensitive method to identify patients
receiving a small prosthesis. However, the predictive accuracy is dep
endent upon training as well as image quality. Furthermore, the value
of planning in advance the type of prosthesis, annuloplasty or homogra
ft for aortic valve replacement remains to be shown.