Background. The International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC) h
as been the standard classification for diagnoses on sickness certific
ates and bills for services to the National Insurance Administration i
n Norway since 1992. Coding according to ICPC is compulsory for all ge
neral practitioners. Objective. The objective of the present study was
to describe the introduction of ICPC in Norway, to comment on introdu
ction problems, and to examine the compliance and validity of coding.
Methods. The study was based on statistics for episodes of sickness ce
rtification in the National Benefit Absence Register. Results. In 1994
, the underlying medical diagnosis was coded in 98% of the sickness ab
sence episodes lasting more than 2 weeks. Component 1 codes (symptom c
odes) were used in 23% of episodes, compared with 26-31% in practice s
tudies. Conclusions. ICPC-coded data in a large Norwegian register app
ear promising. Most doctors do accurate and careful work in coding, an
d data appear to be of acceptable quality for further analysis. It is
a matter of concern, however, that as many as 23% of episodes had comp
onent 1 codes, since these certificates were issued during follow-up e
ncounters. The introduction of ICPC coding has enabled researchers to
use diagnoses in the analyses of sickness absence. The growing use of
ICPC in general practice has made multi-practice studies possible. The
introduction of criteria is mandatory for the improvement of validity
in diagnostic coding.