COMPARISON BETWEEN ABNORMALITIES IN SEGMENTAL ENDOCARDIAL MOTION AND ABNORMALITIES IN SEGMENTAL WALL THICKENING AFTER ANTERIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A CINE-MAGNETIC RESONANCE STUDY
P. Germain et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN ABNORMALITIES IN SEGMENTAL ENDOCARDIAL MOTION AND ABNORMALITIES IN SEGMENTAL WALL THICKENING AFTER ANTERIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A CINE-MAGNETIC RESONANCE STUDY, European heart journal, 17(9), 1996, pp. 1350-1361
In this study, two patterns of regional contraction of the left ventri
cle have been studied: endocardial motion and wall thickening, in orde
r to check which of these was the most affected after myocardial infar
ction. The clinical relevance of this comparison was to assess which p
arameter of the regional contraction abnormality would best depict the
severity of the infarction. Long axis cine-magnetic resonance slices
were used to assess segmental systolic left ventricular endocardial mo
tion and segmental systolic wall thickening in 39 normal subjects and
in 30 patients at the chronic stage of an anterior myocardial infarcti
on. In the group of normal subjects, endocardial motion and wail thick
ening showed significant regional heterogeneity. Overall endocardial m
otion was greater than overall wall thickening: 9.5 +/- 2.0 mm vs 7.1
+/- 1.8 mm, P=4 x 10(-12) (3.1 +/- 1.2 mm vs 2.0 +/- 0.7 mm, P=9 x 10(
-5) after infarction). A significant linear correlation was found betw
een these two parameters. In the infarction group, abnormality scores
for endocardial motion and for wall thickening were calculated. These
scores were defined as the average values exceeding the mean minus two
standard deviations of the normal range for segments corresponding to
the antero-septal-apical walls. The abnormality score for endocardial
motion was greater than the abnormality score for wall thickening: 0.
31 +/- 0.12 vs 0.20 +/- 0.07, P=9 x 10(-4). We conclude that, in clini
cal practice, endocardial motion is affected to a greater degree by my
ocardial infarction than is wall thickening and therefore constitutes
a more discriminant index in the assessment of post-infarction patient
s.