D. Otto, SUBALTERNITY AND INTERNATIONAL-LAW - THE PROBLEMS OF GLOBAL COMMUNITYAND THE INCOMMENSURABILITY OF DIFFERENCE, Social & legal studies, 5(3), 1996, pp. 337
This article draws on the work of the Indian Subaltern Studies collect
ive to explore the possibilities for imagining processes whereby non-d
ominant, non-elite, subaltern individuals and groupings might particip
ate as subjects of international law. It suggests that the decolonizat
ion agenda of the UN Charter has repeated imperialism, albeit with a n
ew legal and moral appearance, in the European production of the postc
olonial nation-state. Parallels are drawn between the G77's strategy t
o counter European hegemony through the promotion of a New World Econo
mic Order and the struggle of the Indian nationalists for independence
. In both endeavours, European knowledge systems were uncritically emb
raced, and, as a result, subaltern experience incommensurable with the
European imagination was silenced. It is suggested that the post-Cold
War narratives of global democratization create new opportunities for
contesting subaltern erasure, and some strategies for developing alte
rnative practices, suggested by Subaltern Studies analyses, are canvas
sed.