INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN THE HOTPLATE TEST AND EFFECTS OF HABITUATION ON SENSITIVITY TO MORPHINE

Citation
Ma. Plone et al., INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN THE HOTPLATE TEST AND EFFECTS OF HABITUATION ON SENSITIVITY TO MORPHINE, Pain, 66(2-3), 1996, pp. 265-270
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Clinical Neurology
Journal title
PainACNP
ISSN journal
03043959
Volume
66
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
265 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-3959(1996)66:2-3<265:IITHTA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Hotplate studies rarely match subjects into groups and often use high temperatures that are less sensitive to the effects of mild analgesics . Subjects may not be matched into groups because it has not been clea rly demonstrated that there are reliable and robust individual differe nces in performance on the hotplate, and out of concern that the testi ng required to match subjects into groups might reduce the sensitivity of the task to mild analgesics by producing 'behavioral tolerance'. H igher hotplate temperatures may be preferred because they reduce varia bility in response latencies, and it may be assumed that this preclude s the need to match subjects into groups. The results of the present s tudy demonstrate that there are reliable and robust differences among individuals tested on the hotplate, regardless of whether the hotplate is 50 degrees C or 55 degrees C (alpha's > 0.90). The present results also confirm that lower hotplate temperatures are much more sensitive to the effects of mild analgesics: increased response latencies follo wing a low dose of morphine (3 mg/kg) could be reliably detected with only 8 rats at 50 degrees C, while the same dose would not be detected reliably at 55 degrees C unless more than 55 rats were tested. Finall y, there was no evidence that habituation to the hotplate produced 'be havioral tolerance' or reduced the sensitivity of the test to the effe cts of morphine. These findings suggest that hotplate studies should m atch subjects into groups and use lower hotplate temperatures in order to increase the sensitivity of the test, but also out of an ethical o bligation to minimize the intensity of the noxious stimulus and the nu mber of animals exposed to it.