MOLECULAR PHYLOGENIES OF FIG POLLINATING AND NON-POLLINATING WASPS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF THE FIG-FIG WASP MUTUALISM

Citation
Ca. Machado et al., MOLECULAR PHYLOGENIES OF FIG POLLINATING AND NON-POLLINATING WASPS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF THE FIG-FIG WASP MUTUALISM, Journal of biogeography, 23(4), 1996, pp. 531-542
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology,Geografhy
Journal title
ISSN journal
03050270
Volume
23
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
531 - 542
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-0270(1996)23:4<531:MPOFPA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Figs host three ecologically distinct groups of wasps: pollinators, no n-pollinators (parasitic wasps) and parasitoids. Both pollinators and non-pollinators complete their life cycles using fig tissue, while par asitoids appear to attack some groups of non-pollinators. We used nucl eotide sequence data to address a series of questions concerning genea logical associations, host specificities and degree of strict-sense co -evolution exhibited by members of these groups. We used the relativel y conserved 12S rRNA gene of the mitochondria to estimate high level r elationships among pollinator, parasitic and parasitoid taxa by sampli ng species collected from host figs representing five sections (three subgenera) from Asia, Africa, Europe and Central America. We found tha t all pollinators formed a clear monophyletic group. However, we could not resolve whether or not all of the non-parasitoid wasps associated with figs (Agaonidae, sensu Boucek) formed a single monophyletic grou p. Further, we used the more variable COII mitochondrial gene to attem pt to determine relationships among closely related species of pollina tors within two New World genera. Using sequences from the same gene w e estimated the phylogenetic relationships among the parasites collect ed from the same New World host fig species and compared them with tho se of the pollinators. At fine taxonomic scale, we found that for both pollinator and parasites, species were generally specific to a given fig host. Moreover, the phylogenies of the non-pollinators are largely congruent with those of the pollinators, suggesting the predominance of strict-sense co-evolution on shared host fig species. The implicati ons of these findings and opportunities for future research are discus sed.