V. Mooney et al., RELATIONSHIP OF LUMBAR STRENGTH IN SHIPYARD WORKERS TO WORKPLACE INJURY CLAIMS, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 21(17), 1996, pp. 2001-2005
Study Design. Strength testing of lumbar extensors of shipyard workers
without back injury claims was accomplished to compare isolated lumba
r strength with the severity of their workplace physical demands and t
he incidence of workplace back injury during a 2-year period. Objectiv
es. To determine if strength is a predictor of workplace injury and if
there is a relationship between the physical demands of the job and s
trength.Summary of Background Data. The role of preplacement strength
testing has not been clarified as a potential means for predicting wor
kplace injury. It has not been clarified whether work activity affects
the strength of the worker. Methods. One hundred fifty-two shipyard w
orkers wee strength tested for isometric lumbar extensor strength. The
y had been classified as to the severity of their job demands accordin
g to the Physical Demand Characteristics. All workers at this industry
were likewise classified. Those workers who were tested were followed
for 2 years to evaluate for claims of back injury. Results. There was
a higher incidence of low back injuries in the heavy and very heavy c
lassification. There was, however, no difference in strength among tho
se workers classified in medium, heavy, and very heavy work. Nine perc
ent of those workers tested had back pains during the following 2 year
s. All but two had higher-than-average strength. Conclusions. There is
no evidence that preplacement back strength testing would predict wor
kplace claims of injury.