RELATIONSHIP OF LUMBAR STRENGTH IN SHIPYARD WORKERS TO WORKPLACE INJURY CLAIMS

Citation
V. Mooney et al., RELATIONSHIP OF LUMBAR STRENGTH IN SHIPYARD WORKERS TO WORKPLACE INJURY CLAIMS, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 21(17), 1996, pp. 2001-2005
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics,"Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
03622436
Volume
21
Issue
17
Year of publication
1996
Pages
2001 - 2005
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(1996)21:17<2001:ROLSIS>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Study Design. Strength testing of lumbar extensors of shipyard workers without back injury claims was accomplished to compare isolated lumba r strength with the severity of their workplace physical demands and t he incidence of workplace back injury during a 2-year period. Objectiv es. To determine if strength is a predictor of workplace injury and if there is a relationship between the physical demands of the job and s trength.Summary of Background Data. The role of preplacement strength testing has not been clarified as a potential means for predicting wor kplace injury. It has not been clarified whether work activity affects the strength of the worker. Methods. One hundred fifty-two shipyard w orkers wee strength tested for isometric lumbar extensor strength. The y had been classified as to the severity of their job demands accordin g to the Physical Demand Characteristics. All workers at this industry were likewise classified. Those workers who were tested were followed for 2 years to evaluate for claims of back injury. Results. There was a higher incidence of low back injuries in the heavy and very heavy c lassification. There was, however, no difference in strength among tho se workers classified in medium, heavy, and very heavy work. Nine perc ent of those workers tested had back pains during the following 2 year s. All but two had higher-than-average strength. Conclusions. There is no evidence that preplacement back strength testing would predict wor kplace claims of injury.