Dl. Fishman et al., WHERE SHOULD THE PHARMACY RESEARCHER LOOK FIRST - COMPARING INTERNATIONAL-PHARMACEUTICAL-ABSTRACTS AND MEDLINE, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84(3), 1996, pp. 402-408
This study compared the usefulness of various CD-ROM versions of inter
national Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) and MEDLINE for pharmacy resea
rch. Journal coverage as well as the strengths and weaknesses of datab
ase structure and contents were considered. The journals indexed in ea
ch database were compared to those identified in a survey of the resea
rch journals most important to University of Maryland at Baltimore pha
rmacy faculty and in a similar North Carolina study rating pharmacy jo
urnals. Ln addition, indexed journals were checked against the Institu
te for Scientific Information's mast recent !ist of high-impact journa
ls in pharmacology and pharmacy. Searches representing a variety of to
pics relevant to pharmacy were conducted in both databases, and the nu
mber and relevance of citations located were analyzed. Results showed
that IPA indexed a greater number of pharmacy titles, but that MEDLINE
indexed more pharmacy journals designated in studies as significant t
o the field. There was little overlap in coverage between the two data
bases, MEDLINE produced larger retrievals for the majority of question
s, but many citations retrieved in IPA did not appear in MEDLINE.