DETECTION OF CORONARY CALCIFICATION WITH ELECTRON-BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - EVALUATION OF INTEREXAMINATION REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON OF 3 IMAGE-ACQUISITION PROTOCOLS

Citation
Sj. Wang et al., DETECTION OF CORONARY CALCIFICATION WITH ELECTRON-BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - EVALUATION OF INTEREXAMINATION REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON OF 3 IMAGE-ACQUISITION PROTOCOLS, The American heart journal, 132(3), 1996, pp. 550-558
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
00028703
Volume
132
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
550 - 558
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8703(1996)132:3<550:DOCCWE>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the variability of electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) measurement of coronary calci fication by using two commonly employed image-acquisition protocols an d to compare this variability with that of a new image-acquisition pro tocol. We performed three EBCT scans within 15 minutes on each of 324 consecutive high-risk, asymptomatic subjects participating in an ongoi ng epidemiologic research investigation. Subjects were divided into th ree groups: group 1 (n = 175) received two scans with a standard 20-sl ice, 3 mm slice thickness image-acquisition protocol and a third scan with the new 20-slice, 6 mm slice thickness protocol; group 2 (n = 77) received two scans with a new 6 mm slice thickness image-acquisition protocol and a third scan with a standard 20-slice, 3 mm slice thickne ss protocol; group 3 (n = 72) received two scans with a 30-slice, 3 mm slice thickness image-acquisition protocol and a third scan with a 20 -slice, 6 mm slice thickness protocol. Calcium score, calcium mass est imate, and calcium volume estimate were determined for each scan. We c ompared retest variability of calcium measurements for each of the thr ee image-acquisition protocols. The variability of the new 6 mm slice thickness protocol was significantly lower than that of either the 20- slice 3 mm slice thickness protocol (p = 0.009) or the 30-slice 3 mm s lice thickness protocol (p = 0.02) for measurement of calcium score, m ass, or volume. Retest reproducibility for all three image-acquisition protocols was low; however, the 20-slice 6 mm slice thickness protoco l gave reproducibility superior to either of the 3 mm slice thickness protocols. Variability of absolute indices increased, and variability of relative indices decreased as the value of these indices increased. EBCT is not sufficiently reproducible to allow serial quantitation of coronary calcium in individual patients over relatively short periods (<2 years).