IMPACT OF ALTERNATING MANURE REMOVAL SCHEDULES ON PEST FLIES (DIPTERA, MUSCIDAE) AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS (COLEOPTERA, HISTERIDAE, STAPHYLINIDAE - ACARINA, MACROCHELIDAE) IN CAGED-LAYER POULTRY MANURE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Ba. Mullens et al., IMPACT OF ALTERNATING MANURE REMOVAL SCHEDULES ON PEST FLIES (DIPTERA, MUSCIDAE) AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS (COLEOPTERA, HISTERIDAE, STAPHYLINIDAE - ACARINA, MACROCHELIDAE) IN CAGED-LAYER POULTRY MANURE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Journal of economic entomology, 89(6), 1996, pp. 1406-1417
Pest fly larvae and adults (Musca, Fannia spp.) and key predator arthr
opods (Macrocheles mites, Carcinops adults and Histeridae larvae, Stap
hylinidae larvae) were monitored for 2 yr on 3 southern California cag
ed-layer poultry facilities. In each manure cleanout cycle, all manure
rows were removed initially in normal removal houses (Normal), while
half of the manure was left undisturbed in alternate removal houses (A
lternate). After 1 mo the remaining rows of manure were removed in the
Alternate houses. In each cycle the manure fauna was sampled before r
emoval, 1 wk after initial removal, 4 wk after initial removal (before
secondary removal in Alternate houses), and 8 wk after initial remova
l (4 wk after secondary removal in Alternate houses). Cleanout caused
significant decreases in key predator taxa 1 wk afterward and increase
d numbers of pest flies for 1-2 mo. Cleanout between March and May usu
ally resulted in a resurgence of Fannia spp., whereas late summer clea
nouts could cause M. domestica problems. Presence of undisturbed manur
e within the Alternate houses did no result in increased numbers of pr
edaceous Coleoptera in nearby disturbed manure relative to Normal hous
es. Numbers of Macrocheles in disturbed manure after cleanout were hig
her when undisturbed manure was immediately adjacent. Pest flies follo
wing a cleanout were not reduced in Alternate houses relative to Norma
l houses. In these open-sided poultry houses, which leave a dry base m
anure pad at cleanout, any slight advantage of fly control afforded by
alternate manure removal probably is overshadowed by the increased ti
me and effort involved.