S. Baumrind et al., APICAL ROOT RESORPTION IN ORTHODONTICALLY TREATED ADULTS, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 110(3), 1996, pp. 311-320
This study analyzed the relationship in orthodontically treated adults
between upper central incisor displacement measured on lateral cephal
ograms and apical root resorption measured on anterior periapical x-ra
y films, A multiple linear regression examined incisor displacements i
i four directions (retraction, advancement, intrusion, and extrusion)
as independent variables, attempting to account for observed differenc
es in the dependent variable, resorption. Mean apical resorption was 1
.36 mm (sd +/- 1.46, n = 73). Mean horizontal displacement of the apex
was -0.83 mm (sd +/- 1.74, n = 67); mean vertical displacement was 0.
19 mm (sd +/- 1.48, n = 67). The regression coefficients for the inter
cept and for retraction were highly significant; those for extrusion,
intrusion, and advancement were not. At the 95% confidence level, an a
verage of 0.99 mm (se = +/- 0.34) of resorption was implied in the abs
ence of root displacement and an average of 0.49 mm (se = +/- 0.14) of
resorption was implied per millimeter of retraction. R(2) for all fou
r directional displacement variables (DDVs) taken together was only 0.
20, which implied that only a relatively small portion of ft-ie observ
ed apical resorption could be accounted for by tooth displacement alon
e. In a secondary set of univariate analyses, the associations between
apical resorption and each of 14 additional treatment-related variabl
es were examined. Only Gender, Elapsed Time, and Total Apical Displace
ment displayed statistically significant associations with apical reso
rption. Additional multiple regressions were then performed in which t
he data for each of these three statistically significant variables we
re considered separately, with the data for the four directional displ
acement variables. The addition of information on Elapsed Time or Tota
l Apical Displacement did not explain a significant additional portion
of the variability in apical resorption, On the other hand, the addit
ion of information on Gender to the information on the four directiona
l displacement variables yielded an R(2) value of 0.35, which indicate
d that these variables taken together could account for approximately
a third of the observed variability in apical resorption in this sampl
e.