Er. Smith et al., CENTRAL PROPRANOLOL AND PINDOLOL, BUT NOT ATENOLOL NOR METOPROLOL, INHIBIT SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR IN MALE-RATS, Physiology & behavior, 59(2), 1996, pp. 241-246
Are the anti-sexual effects of propranolol and pindolol due to actions
within the brain? To answer this, these agents were administered dire
ctly into the brain ventricular system (ICV). Additionally, atenolol a
nd metoprolol were evaluated to see whether differential delivery to t
he brain contributed to the observed lack of effect of systemically ad
ministered beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists. ICV administration of pin
dolol (45 or 90 mu g) was followed by a suppression of copulation. At
45 mu g, inhibition was limited to performance aspects of copulation,
whereas at 90 mu g, decrements in motivational and performance aspects
of copulation were evident. ICV administration of propranolol also su
ppressed copulatory behavior. At 45 mu g, no significant effects were
observed, whereas at 90 mu g decrements in motivational and performanc
e aspects of copulation were evident. In contrast, ICV administration
of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists, atenolol and metoprolol, was
not associated with any major modifications in copulatory behavior. We
suggest that the inhibitory effects of propranolol and pindolol may i
nvolve interactions with 5-HT1A receptors in the CNS. Alternatively, i
t may be that the adverse effects of pindolol and propranolol are due
to the simultaneous blockade of both beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptor
s.