Flash evoked potentials (FEPs) undergo within- and between-session cha
nges and are modified by auditory white noise (26). We examined whethe
r an auditory potential produced by the ''click'' associated with the
strobe discharge could be recorded, and if alterations in an auditory
response could explain the within- and between-session changes in FEPs
. We also examined differences between a frontal cortex or a nasal ref
erence electrode location on FEPs and auditory potentials. An auditory
potential associated with the strobe discharge could be clearly recor
ded. This response was eliminated by the presence of 80 dB SPL masking
white noise. However, the within- and between-session changes in FEPs
could not be explained by modifications of the auditory potential. An
imals whose ear drums were ruptured did not exhibit an auditory respon
se, and their FEPs were similar to those of controls tested in the pre
sence of masking white noise; A nasal reference electrode decreased th
e impact of auditory potentials on FEPs, but may allow visual potentia
ls (electroretinogram and optic tract activity) to influence FEPs. The
data show that auditory potentials associated with the strobe dischar
ge can be recorded from the visual cortex of rats, and that these audi
tory responses represent a possible confounding factor in the interpre
tation of toxicological studies employing FEPs.