Cm. Sturgeon et J. Seth, WHY DO IMMUNOASSAYS FOR TUMOR-MARKERS GIVE DIFFERING RESULTS - A VIEWFROM THE UK NATIONAL EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCHEMES, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry, 34(9), 1996, pp. 755-759
External Quality Assessment schemes can provide unique insight into ho
w current methods are performing in the field. Results from the UK Nat
ional External Quality Assessment Schemes, which monitor performance o
f immunoassays for a number of tumour markers and peptide hormones in
serum, show that in spite of considerable improvements resulting from
increased assay automation, major discrepancies in results obtained ar
e still observed. Reasons for this include poor calibration, use of an
tibodies of differing specificity, and vulnerability to clinically rel
evant interferences. Variation in quoted reference ranges is also a ca
use of concern. Each of these important aspects of performance will re
quire attention if improved between-method and between-laboratory agre
ement is to be achieved.