Vn. Pavlik et al., RESPONSE RATES TO RANDOM DIGIT DIALING FOR RECRUITING PARTICIPANTS TOAN ONSITE HEALTH STUDY, Public health reports, 111(5), 1996, pp. 444-450
Objective. To evaluate the response rates when random digit dialing wa
s used as a substitute for geographic area sampling and household inte
rviews to recruit 2100 African Americans for a blood pressure measurem
ent and hypertension-related knowledge and attitudes survey. Methods.
Random digit dialing was used to identify African American adults livi
ng in 12 low-income ZIP code areas of Houston, Texas. A brief survey o
f hypertension awareness and treatment was administered to ail respond
ents. Those who self-identified as African American were invited to a
community location for blood pressure measurement and an extended pers
onal interview. An incentive of $10 was offered for the completed clin
ic visit A substudy of nonrespondents was carried out to test the effe
ctiveness of a $25 incentive in increasing the response rate. Data fro
m the initial random telephone interview were used to identify differe
nces between those who did and did not attend the measurement session.
Results. Ninety-four percent of eligible persons contacted completed
the telephone survey, and 65% agreed to visit a central community site
for blood pressure measurement. in spite of the financial incentive a
nd multiple attempts to reschedule missed appointments, only 26% of th
e 65% who agreed to attend completed the scheduled visit in the substu
dy of the higher financial incentive, all of those who missed the orig
inal appointment agreed to another appointment, and 85% of this subgro
up kept it. Not being employed hull-time and a history of hypertension
were consistently associated with agreement to be measured and keepin
g an appointment In spite of the low response rate for scheduled appoi
ntments, differences-other than in employment status and a history of
hypertension-between responders and nonresponders were small and consi
stent with what is usually observed in health surveys. Conclusions. Th
e use of random digit dialing as a substitute for area sampling and ho
usehold screening resulted in unacceptably low response rates in the s
tudy population and should not be undertaken without further research
on ways to increase response rates.