Hajm. Kurvers et al., SKIN BLOOD-FLOW DISTURBANCES IN THE CONTRALATERAL LIMB IN A PERIPHERAL MONONEUROPATHY IN THE RAT, Neuroscience, 74(3), 1996, pp. 935-943
Electrical excitation of nociceptive afferents in an extremity has bee
n demonstrated to increase skin blood flow in the contralateral extrem
ity. Hence, one would expect that loose sciatic nerve ligation, which
induces an experimental painful peripheral neuropathy, may also provok
e a vasodilator response in the contralateral hindpaw. On the non-liga
ted side, such a response may involve inhibited skin vasoconstrictor a
ctivity as well as neurogenically mediated active vasodilation. We stu
died skin blood flow changes in the rat hindpaw consequent to contrala
teral loose sciatic nerve ligation. After ligation, we also investigat
ed whether blockade of afferent input from the ligated sciatic nerve t
o the spinal cord, by means of lidocaine, overrules the vasodilator re
sponse in the non-ligated paw. On the non-ligated side, we assessed th
e vasoconstrictor response of skin microvessels to cooling of the rat
abdomen as a measure of skin vasoconstrictor activity in this paw. In
order to investigate the involvement of sensory and/or non-sensory ner
ve fibers in the non-ligated sciatic nerve on skin blood flow abnormal
ities in the non-ligated paw, we studied the influence of blockade of
these fibers through successive capsaicin and lidocaine application. W
e show that loose ligation of the sciatic nerve induces a vasodilator
response in the contralateral hindpaw, which is completely abolished b
y blockade of afferent input From the ligated sciatic nerve. From day
1 after ligation, skin vasoconstrictor activity in the non-ligated paw
was reduced, as indicated by an impaired vasoconstrictor response to
cooling of the rat abdomen. Besides, blockade of sensory but not of no
n-sensory nerve fibers on the non-ligated side attenuated the vasodila
tor response in this paw. The data presented here indicate that loose
ligation of the rat sciatic nerve induces a vasodilator response in th
e contralateral hindpaw. On the non-ligated side, this vasodilator res
ponse may involve inhibition of skin vasoconstrictor activity, as well
as antidromically acting sensory nerve fibers. Copyright (C) 1996 IBR
O.