COMPARISON OF OSSIFICATION OF DEMINERALIZED BONE, HYDROXYAPATITE, GELFOAM, AND BONE WAX IN CRANIAL DEFECT REPAIR

Citation
Fa. Papay et al., COMPARISON OF OSSIFICATION OF DEMINERALIZED BONE, HYDROXYAPATITE, GELFOAM, AND BONE WAX IN CRANIAL DEFECT REPAIR, The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 7(5), 1996, pp. 347-351
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
10492275
Volume
7
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
347 - 351
Database
ISI
SICI code
1049-2275(1996)7:5<347:COOODB>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Demineralized bone allografts in the repair of calvarial defects are c ompared with other common bone fillers. This study uses a video-digiti zing radiographic analysis of calvarial defect ossification to determi ne calcification of bone defects and its relation to postoperative cli nical examination and regional controls. The postoperative clinical re sults at 3 months demonstrated that bony healing was greatest in bur h oles filled with demineralized bone and hydroxyapatite. Radiographic a nalysis demonstrated calcification of demineralized bone-filled defect s compared to bone wax- and Gelfoam-filled regions. Hydroxyapatite gra nules are radiographically dense, thus not allowing accurate measureme nt of true bone healing. The results suggest that demineralized bone a nd hydroxyapatite provide better structural support via bone healing t o defined calvarial defects than do Gelfoam and bone wax.