COMPARISON BETWEEN ANTIGEN-CAPTURE ELISA AND CONVENTIONAL METHODS USED FOR TITRATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS

Citation
Mk. Hassan et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN ANTIGEN-CAPTURE ELISA AND CONVENTIONAL METHODS USED FOR TITRATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS, Avian diseases, 40(3), 1996, pp. 562-566
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00052086
Volume
40
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
562 - 566
Database
ISI
SICI code
0005-2086(1996)40:3<562:CBAEAC>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Two antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (polyclonal and monoclonal AC-ELISAs) were developed and evaluated for titration of i nfectious bursal disease viruses (IBDVs) propagated in different host systems, namely BGM-70 continuous cell line, primary chicken embryo fi broblast cells, and chicken bursa of Fabricius. The polyclonal system was more sensitive (P < 0.05) than the monoclonal system but both were specific as indicated by the negative results obtained with three non -IBDVs. The results revealed chat the conventional systems used for ti tration of IBDVs (cell cultures and embryonating chicken eggs) were mo re sensitive than the polyclonal AC-ELISA.