Three primary descriptors of community structure are the number, ident
ities (composition), and abundances of species therein. Over the past
35 years, most attention has focused on relationships involving number
(species-area and species-energy relation ships) or abundance distrib
utions (broken-stick, geometric, log-normal, core-satellite, etc.). Co
mposition patterns have bren underemphasized, even though several tool
s for addressing particular non-random patterns in species composition
are available. One non-random pattern in community composition is nes
ted subset structure. A community has a nested subset structure if the
species found in depauperate replicates are also found in progressive
ly more Species-rich assemblages. In this review, the problems of fail
ing to consider composition patterns like nestedness are described, us
ing species-area relationships and the SLOSS debate (single large or s
everal small reserves) as an example. In addition, nestedness analyses
are promoted as: 1) important descriptive tools for determining wheth
er a community has this common non-random pattern of species compositi
on, and 2) as important investigative tools for suggesting mechanisms
potentially structuring a community.