Many hypotheses link tropical forest tree diversity with vegetation dy
namics and productivity. Evaluations based on permanent sample plot da
ta face problems of interpretation. I suggest, as examples, three poin
ts requiring consideration: 1) Species richness in a plot is the outco
me of the detailed history of that particular site and the available s
pecies (i.e. the species pool). Diversity cannot be explained as a pro
duct of current conditions unless these are stable and the system is a
t equilibrium; 2) Existing permanent sample plots (PSPs) do not provid
e unbiased samples of global tropical forests; and 3) Variation in sta
nd parameters may be more appropriate than averaged values when consid
ering the maintenance of diversity, e.g. spatial and temporal variatio
n in mortality and recruitment may be more crucial than mean values. I
n this note I emphasise how every site has a specific explanation for
local species occurrences and that theories which do not include histo
rical components are incomplete. The above points are illustrated by c
onsideration of a paper by Phillips et al. where PSP data have been us
ed to argue a causative relationship between forest productivity and s
pecies richness.