R. Breslow et Wh. Chapman, ON THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF RIBONUCLEASE-A - RELEVANCE OF ENZYMATICSTUDIES WITH A P-NITROPHENYLPHOSPHATE ESTER AND A THIOPHOSPHATE ESTER, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 93(19), 1996, pp. 10018-10021
It has been reported that His-119 of ribonuclease A plays a major role
as an imidazolium ion acid catalyst in the cyclization/cleavage of no
rmal dinucleotides but that it is not needed for the cyclization/cleav
age of 3'-uridyl p-nitrophenyl phosphate. We see that this is also tru
e for simple buffer catalysis, where imidazole (as in His-12 of the en
zyme), but not imidazolium ion, plays a significant catalytic role wit
h the nitrophenyl substrate, but both are catalytic for normal dinucle
otides such as uridyluridine. Rate studies show that the enzyme cataly
zes the cyclization of the nitrophenylphosphate derivative 47,000,000
times less effectively (k(cat)/k(uncat)) than it does uridyladenosine,
indicating that approximate to 50% of the catalytic free energy chang
e is lost with this substrate. This suggests that the nitrophenyl subs
trate is not correctly bound to take full advantage of the catalytic g
roups of the enzyme and is thus not a good guide to the mechanism used
by normal nucleotides. The published data on kinetic effects with rib
onuclease A of substituting thiophosphate groups for the phosphate gro
ups of normal substrates has been discussed elsewhere, and it was argu
ed that these effects are suggestive of the classical mechanism for ri
bonuclease action, not the novel mechanism we have recently proposed.
The details of these rate effects, including stereochemical preference
s in the thiophosphate series, can be invoked as support for our newer
mechanism.