In snakes and other predators that swallow their food whole, gape size
sets an upper limit to ingestible prey size. Individuals that vary in
body size and swallowing capacity will therefore differ not only in e
nergy requirements but also in rates of food intake. Here I show that
size-frequency distribution of available prey may be an important dete
rminant of life-history evolution in snakes and other gape-limited pre
dators. A simple model is presented for the rate of net energy gain of
gape-limited predators during food scarcity as a function of body siz
e and swallowing capacity of the predator. Net energy gain is defined
as the difference between rates of energy intake and expenditure while
searching for prey, and thus represents the energetic scope available
for growth, storage, reproduction, and survival. The model suggests t
hat rate of energy intake will increase asymptotically with predator b
ody size until it reaches an asymptote that differs depending on the s
ize-frequency distribution of available prey. Rate of net energy gain
will reach a maximum at intermediate or large predator size, but shift
towards smaller predator body size if energy demands increase, maximu
m ingestible prey size increases more rapidly with predator size, or i
f mean body size of available prey decreases. Variation in swallowing
capacity among equal-sized predators results in a difference in net en
ergy gains that is at a maximum in intermediate-sized individuals. The
model generates seven testable predictions. (1) Smaller body size doe
s not confer an energetic advantage during periods of prey scarcity. (
2) Mortality due to energy shortage sets lower and upper limits to bod
y size. (3) Temporal shifts in size-frequency distribution of prey wil
l result in oscillating survival selection on body size. (4) The propo
rtion of resources allocated to energy storage and reproduction should
increase with increasing body size at the expense of energy allocated
to growth. (5) The reproductive advantage of large body size in femal
es will increase with prey availability. (6) The intensity of selectio
n on characters determining swallowing capacity will vary with body si
ze and be lowest in larger individuals. (7) Discrimination against sma
ll prey is more likely among larger than among smaller individuals. Ex
amples from natural populations relating to these predictions are prov
ided.