BODY-SIZE AND NET ENERGY GAIN IN GAPE-LIMITED PREDATORS - A MODEL

Authors
Citation
A. Forsman, BODY-SIZE AND NET ENERGY GAIN IN GAPE-LIMITED PREDATORS - A MODEL, Journal of herpetology, 30(3), 1996, pp. 307-319
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Zoology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00221511
Volume
30
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
307 - 319
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1511(1996)30:3<307:BANEGI>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
In snakes and other predators that swallow their food whole, gape size sets an upper limit to ingestible prey size. Individuals that vary in body size and swallowing capacity will therefore differ not only in e nergy requirements but also in rates of food intake. Here I show that size-frequency distribution of available prey may be an important dete rminant of life-history evolution in snakes and other gape-limited pre dators. A simple model is presented for the rate of net energy gain of gape-limited predators during food scarcity as a function of body siz e and swallowing capacity of the predator. Net energy gain is defined as the difference between rates of energy intake and expenditure while searching for prey, and thus represents the energetic scope available for growth, storage, reproduction, and survival. The model suggests t hat rate of energy intake will increase asymptotically with predator b ody size until it reaches an asymptote that differs depending on the s ize-frequency distribution of available prey. Rate of net energy gain will reach a maximum at intermediate or large predator size, but shift towards smaller predator body size if energy demands increase, maximu m ingestible prey size increases more rapidly with predator size, or i f mean body size of available prey decreases. Variation in swallowing capacity among equal-sized predators results in a difference in net en ergy gains that is at a maximum in intermediate-sized individuals. The model generates seven testable predictions. (1) Smaller body size doe s not confer an energetic advantage during periods of prey scarcity. ( 2) Mortality due to energy shortage sets lower and upper limits to bod y size. (3) Temporal shifts in size-frequency distribution of prey wil l result in oscillating survival selection on body size. (4) The propo rtion of resources allocated to energy storage and reproduction should increase with increasing body size at the expense of energy allocated to growth. (5) The reproductive advantage of large body size in femal es will increase with prey availability. (6) The intensity of selectio n on characters determining swallowing capacity will vary with body si ze and be lowest in larger individuals. (7) Discrimination against sma ll prey is more likely among larger than among smaller individuals. Ex amples from natural populations relating to these predictions are prov ided.