Rn. Grishanin et al., PHOTORESPONSES IN RHODOBACTER-SPHAEROIDES - ROLE OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC ELECTRON-TRANSPORT, Journal of bacteriology, 179(1), 1997, pp. 24-30
Rhodobacter sphaeroides responds to a decrease in light intensity by a
transient stop followed by adaptation, There is no measurable respons
e to increases in light intensity, We confirmed that photosynthetic el
ectron transport is essential for a photoresponse, as (i) inhibitors o
f photosynthetic electron transport inhibit photoresponses, (ii) elect
ron transport to oxidases in the presence of oxygen reduces the photor
esponse, and (iii) the magnitude of the response is dependent on the p
hotopigment content of the cells, The photoresponses of cells grown in
high light, which have lower concentrations of light-harvesting photo
pigment and reaction centers, saturated at much higher light intensiti
es than the photoresponses of cells grown in low light, which have hig
h concentrations of light harvesting pigments and reaction centers, We
examined whether the primary sensory signal from the photosynthetic e
lectron transport chain was a change in the electrochemical proton gra
dient or a change in the rate of electron transport itself (probably r
eflecting redox sensing), R. sphaeroides showed no response to the add
ition of the proton ionophore carbonyl cyanide 4-trifluoromethoxypheny
lhydrazone, which decreased the electrochemical proton gradient, altho
ugh a behavioral response was seen to a reduction in light intensity t
hat caused an equivalent reduction in proton gradient, These results s
trongly suggest that (i) the photosynthetic apparatus is the primary p
hotoreceptor, (ii) the primary signal is generated by a change in the
rate of electron transport, (iii) the change in the electrochemical pr
oton gradient is not the primary photosensory signal, and (iv) stimuli
affecting electron transport rates integrate via the electron transpo
rt chain.