Many positive and normative results in models using the monopolistic c
ompetition framework of the Dixit-Stiglitz-Spence type depend on the v
alue of an important parameter, the 'taste for variety'. In these mode
ls, however, the taste for variety is linked in a close but arbitrary
manner to the degree of market power of monopolistic competitors. In t
his paper we make a simple modification to the basic model, which clea
rly disentangles taste for variety and market power. We then show how
this changes the usual comparisons between social optimum and market o
utcomes.