Purpose: Recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy has b
een extensively reported. The occurrence, however, of another ipsilate
ral restenosis that requires a third carotid operation is rare. The pu
rpose of this study was to evaluate possible risk factors and the most
efficacious management of the patient with ''secondary'' recurrent ca
rotid stenosis. Methods: A survey of the Southern Association for Vasc
ular Surgery was performed, and 31 patients who had had surgery for se
condary recurrent carotid stenosis were identified. Results: The mean
interval between the recurrent stenosis operation and secondary recurr
ent carotid stenosis was 39.8 months (range, 9 to 83 months). At the t
hird operation, 21 patients underwent carotid patch angioplasty and 10
underwent carotid resection with an interposition saphenous vein graf
t. No postoperative strokes or deaths occurred; three patients (10%) h
ad a peripheral nerve injury. Nine early (<24 mo) secondary recurrent
carotid stenoses occurred, and these patients underwent patch angiopla
sty. Twenty-three female, cigarette-smoking patients and 20 patients w
ith elevated lipid levels had early restenosis and were identified as
being at high risk for the development of another stenosis. A fourth s
ignificant stenosis developed in five of these high-risk patients who
had saphenous vein patch angioplasty at their third carotid operation;
eight other high-risk patients had carotid resection with an interpos
ition saphenous vein graft, and no other stenosis developed. Conclusio
n: Patients who have secondary recurrent carotid stenoses can safely u
ndergo a third carotid operation. Female habitual smokers with elevate
d lipid levels and an early restenosis appear to be at high risk of se
condary recurrent carotid stenoses. When surgery is necessary, carotid
resection with an interposition saphenous vein graft appears more dur
able than patch angioplasty.