Hj. Kreder et al., CONSISTENCY OF AO FRACTURE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE DISTAL RADIUS, Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 78B(5), 1996, pp. 726-731
We sought to quantify agreement by different assessors of the AO class
ification for distal fractures of the radius. Thirty radiographs of ac
ute distal radial fractures were evaluated by 36 assessors of varying
clinical experience. Our findings suggest that AO 'type' and the prese
nce or absence of articular displacement are measured with high consis
tency when classification of distal radial fractures is undertaken by
experienced observers. Assessors at all experience levels had difficul
ty agreeing on AO 'group' and especially AO 'subgroup'. To categorise
distal radial fractures according to joint displacement and AO type is
simple and reproducible. Our study examined only whether distal radia
l fractures could be consistently classified according to the AO syste
m. Validation of the classification as a predictor of outcome will req
uire a prospective clinical study.